Closed-Source Food With An EULA

foodandwine

New Era of the Recipe Burglar

Pete Wells explores the mysterious world of kitchen spies, copycat chefs and copyright lawyers who might, one day soon, change the way we eat.

By Pete Wells

I want to be there on New Year’s Eve when they seal the 2006 time capsule, because I’ ve found a restaurant dish that will tell future earthlings everything they need to know about what happened to food this year. It comes from Chicago-finally, improbably, the most talked-about dining destination in America. It’s the creation of Homaro Cantu of Moto restaurant, one of a handful of avant-garde chefs who believe they are leading cuisine into the future, and it looks like something Rosie the robot might whip up for snack time at the Jetsons’ . It’s an image of cheerful pink cotton candy printed on a tiny sheet of edible paper that tastes like cotton candy. The paper measures roughly two-by-2.75-by-zero inches, so it won’t take up much space in the time capsule, and, as far as I can tell, it won’t suffer at all from rot or mold over the next hundred years. But none of this explains why this morsel ought to be preserved for future generations. The truly historic feature of Cantu’s two-dimensional treat is the legal notice printed beneath the cotton-candy image:

Confidential Property of and (C) H. Cantu. Patent Pending. No further use or disclosure is permitted without prior approval of H. Cantu.

Consider your typical transaction as a restaurant patron. You choose something from the menu, it’s brought to your table, you eat it, and, if it was prepared adequately, you pay for it. Under those circumstances, you’ d probably say that you had bought the food. But here is a chef claiming that he still owns the food you’re swallowing. This is something new. Inarguably, Cantu’s gonzo innovations place him among the shock troops of American cuisine, but it’s possible that a more significant legacy will be his efforts to own the ideas that are born in his kitchen. He has already filed 12 applications for patents, including one detailing the process for making cotton-candy paper, and says there are more to come.

…continues at foodandwine, well worth a read if you are anyone dealing in intellectual property, open-source, and the like.

ISTR that under British law, recipes are explicitly not copyrightable?

(Via)

Comments

2 responses to “Closed-Source Food With An EULA”

  1. Stephen Usher
    re: Closed-Source Food With An EULA

    Hmm.. I do seem to remember somewhere that a recipe is classed as an algorithm and hence isn’t patentable but I don’t think that they are exempt from copyright, though in that case it would be the wording of the recipe rather than the combination of ingredients and the method would be covered.

    I’ve not seen any look-and-feel(-and-taste) court cases yet. 🙂

  2. Stephen Usher
    P.S.

    If the cook is claiming ownership of the food even after consumption then does he then own rights over the consumer’s body once it’s been metabolised and parts have been incorporated?

    i.e. the license states that the product can’t be used in any manner without prior consent of the IP owner. So, let’s say that some molecules from the food get incorporated into the consumer’s right finger. Does this mean that the consumer now has to get permission to use their finger?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *