- @MatrixSCIT @KimZetter @taosecurity Have read the report, there is much good in the security analysis and philosophy, but > #
- @MatrixSCIT @taosecurity < the headline stats which @KimZetter & others (Govt?) will take away are scary without providing context/history #
- @taosecurity @kimzetter Could it not also be better than your stats show, since you will never see firms who do security properly? #
- @taosecurity @kimzetter It seems strange, then, to bandy phrases like "it's worse than our stats show", as if referring to the Internet #
- @LucasErratus While you are at it, plz suggest to your marketing department that not all phone numbers are 10 digits, and permit a "+" #
- : "#Cybersecurity: Demand An Evidence-Based Approach" ( http://t.co/0BKg3e5L at Computerworld ) http://t.co/gwQYagQ4 #
- An attempt to explain my concern more clearly:
http://t.co/ZCyyDBtF
cc and thanks: @LucasErratus @KimZetter @taosecurity @kashhill # - @LucasErratus So, to check: all the "earliest compromise" stats re: the 416-day figure relate to live, ongoing breaches in a 400+ day range? #
- @LucasErratus …or (alternate) you get called in to investigate a 400+ day old breach and log it as such, even if it's dead ? #
- @LucasErratus But I am correct regards what happens with the aggregate TTDs – one per customer as cited in your tweet y'day – re: averaging? #
- @LucasErratus Posting updated to include your correction. 🙂 #
Leave a Reply