- @pauljakma it's called Cumulative Voting http://bit.ly/953Lz6 – fairer because _everyone's_ 2nd preferences (etc) get counted. in reply to pauljakma #
- @pauljakma the problem with "I want X, but if I can't have them then I want Y" is the definition of "can't have" … in reply to pauljakma #
- @bulletford that's a good article, thank you; read also Bagehot on how constituency creation is broken: http://bit.ly/cUd6dg in reply to bulletford #
- @pauljakma otherwise known as "we're doing something stupid already, let's roll it out further" argument. 🙂 in reply to pauljakma #
- @pauljakma do me a favour and define "optimise" in this context? And why is pseudo/multi-round preferable to cumulative? in reply to pauljakma #
- @pauljakma Optimisation is gaming the system; anyway, with STV your 2nd vote is ignored if the 1st is popular – how fair is that ? in reply to pauljakma #
- Interesting #PR essay from a Labour MP http://www.tomharris.org.uk/2010/05/09/first-past-the-post-is-a-rubbish-electoral-system/ #
- @pauljakma Single / Multi is the big question, agreed; Are you voting for a Parliament, or for a Representative in Parliament(currently yes) in reply to pauljakma #
- fresh garden oregano FTW! #
Leave a Reply