If the state deploys infrastructural internet services with logging & content filtering, those things are surveillance & censorship because they are done by the state
The state has a monopoly on violence.
The state has a monopoly on censorship.
The state tries to have a monopoly on surveillance.
If the state deploys infrastructural internet services with logging and content filtering, those things are surveillance and censorship because [they are] “done by the state”.
The state has a monopoly on violence.The state has a monopoly on censorship.The state tries to have a monopoly on surveillance.If the state deploys infrastructural internet services with logging and content filtering, those things are surveillance and censorship, because "done by the state".
While I understand your concerns and generally don’t endorse the service in question, that privacy policy does not really sound ominous to me. It says that since once you click through the warning they need to provide you with the resolution, they have to keep your IP allowlisted for some time.
Leave a Reply