…but he does miss:
“…and the other half of the problem is that you won’t have good OPSEC with good *tools* but lacking competent *users*”
End-to-end secure stupidity is a thing.
by Alec Muffett
…but he does miss:
“…and the other half of the problem is that you won’t have good OPSEC with good *tools* but lacking competent *users*”
End-to-end secure stupidity is a thing.
@alecm
It’s been described elsewhere as being “like armoured vehicles with armed officers taking money between two cardboard boxes, and it’s the cardboard box at the end that we worry about, because the user at the end may not be as well defended.”
Or, in this case, seems to think invoking the term “OPSEC” will provide all the magical coverage necessary.
Leave a Reply