We’re in the middle of a perfect storm for rollback of the “open web” and burgeoning online surveillance

Looking at fallout of the KOSA hearings today — and subsequent commentary — I remain optimistic for the development of social technology & communication but I’m beginning to think the open web may basically “Do a Yahoo!” and fade, largely because of our self-appointed privacy, safety and national-security activists.

We are living at an unfortunate confluence of several movements in civil society and politics:

We are in for a rough few years. There will be losses. The “app” ecosystem will likely take a big — possibly majority — chunk out of the “open web” as users demand features which are more easily built without the abstraction of traditional web/web-like services.

“App Stores” will be caught between competing regulators who want them to be more open, versus those who want them to police software functionality and user attributes. The users will suffer in the middle of this Godzilla battle, but nobody cares about them.

And actual privacy and anonymity will be on the back foot for a decade or more.

[*] GAFAM / Google Apple Facebook Amazon Microsoft TikTok Twitter X … whatever the acronym is today.

Comments

5 responses to “We’re in the middle of a perfect storm for rollback of the “open web” and burgeoning online surveillance”

  1. D

    Was Google there? I didn’t hear they were.

    I think it’s telling they weren’t. Google is far more dangerous than the rest, with the exception of Microsoft, who have been harming our country since the 1980’s with their conflicts of interest. (And ugly unintuitive software.)

    Clearly those two are already in bed with those who want to enlarge the surveillance state.

    It’s they who are ‘addicted.’ Addicted to eavesdropping on us. I bet some of them want to get rid of switched networks and make us all go back to party lines. Much easier to tap.

    Using children as human shields: cowards and deceivers.

    AND I agree with you, they’re giving a false sense of security to parents by implying their laws will protect children; ~ no need for the parents to worry their pretty little heads once we pass our wonderful bill.

    1. Yeah. Nah. Sounds to me like you are imagining collusion.

      1. D

        As with any extremely large organization there’s a range of opinions on how a relationship should be handled. As well as individuals who tow the line and those who go rogue.

        I don’t doubt individuals within GAFAMTTX and within state law enforcement are “colluding” about stuff, but that’s not what I meant.

        My opinion is, at least in the U.S., the govt. has allowed so many mergers to happen (which I don’t believe should’ve happened since it reduces choice and competition) because it’s easier to coerce a few companies versus 10-100. (Not to mention various people thinking their stock will spike.)

        That would be a bullet point I would add: deep state pressuring pols to allow many mergers which reduce competition but also reduce the number of CEO’s to call to coerce.

        With regards to Microsoft, how many police stations use GNU/Linux? *BSD? Macs? Perhaps a few near Cupertino, but I bet they also have to run VNC or something like VMWare to use software written to be exclusive for MS WIN. Possibly since the suit which went to the Supreme Court, MS has lavished money on the political system so they can avoid that kind of scrutiny again. Included in that is “what can we do for you?” And “you’d better keep our helping you out of the press.”

        But I wouldn’t call it collusion, more like trying to protect their reputation and profits. “The cost of doing business.”

        Here’s Google being more judgemental/accusatory/we-know-better than our legal system.
        https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/08/googles-scans-private-photos-led-false-accusations-child-abuse

        So I wouldn’t say they’re exactly colluding, but in many ways, far too cozy. Or at least they share a number of similar and wrong values.

        The FBI’s attempt to coerce Apple came out in public years ago when some Islamist’s iPhone was locked and the FBI wanted in, seemingly claiming only Apple could do it, and also the need for a back door.

        Cook & Apple were dragged over the coals. They refused to collude, but I’m sure they are still being coerced.

        So perhaps another bullet point I would offer is: a lacking educational system in which too many kids and adults who’ve been through it believe “if you have nothing to hide” you don’t need all that excessive security and privacy.

        Which is fundamentally “guilty until proven innocent,” which I sure hope most of those same people would reject.

  2. mark

    and part of the shutting off of the open web just started here in the uk. i just discovered that porn sites myfreecams and streamate are blocking uk users by having them go through with making an account and going through age verification first before viewing. trying to find forums talking about it it look’s like the age verification for MFC’s at least it surprise surprise yoti.

    1. mark

      correction i was wrong about streamate, but it is true of MFC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *