Really, I am. For instance, this article posits:

1. There exists knowledge too dangerous to be available on the internet
2. The problem with cybersecurity is not the vulnerability, it’s the attack tool
3. People aren’t already at risk of deceit

“YES BUT SCALE, ALEC” – I disagree; we made that argument re: SPAM and we lost.

Such evaluations attempt to identify dangerous capabilities such as … dangerous knowledge about sensitive subjects such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon production; capacity to carry out offensive cyber operations; the ability to manipulate, persuade, or deceive human observers

https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/skating-to-where-the-puck-is-going/