Marketing Groupthink:
- looks like a duck.
- quacks like a duck.
- call it an eagle because both can fly and the latter has better mindshare.
by Alec Muffett
Marketing Groupthink:
- looks like a duck.
- quacks like a duck.
- call it an eagle because both can fly and the latter has better mindshare.
That is a good one.
Development: o looks like a duck o quacks like a duck o must be a virtual duck because a real duck has defects and will not act like a real duck
dl
Building on Dan’s comment, there are two variations:
(1) We have ducks. Since both ducks and eagles are birds, it should be easy to use a duck to host multiple virtual birds – ducks, eagles, whatever. So now we have eagles.
(2) We don’t actually have any ducks, but I’m sure this turkey over here can support a virtual duck… as long as you don’t want it to float.
(See also my obscure blog entries on phenomenalism and supervenience. What are the primary and secondary intensions of the concept “duck”? On second thoughts, don’t.)
*cough* Java Desktop System *cough*
I was hoping/wondering if/when someone might mention the J-word. 😎
It’s made from tofu, doesn’t contain coffee nor duck?
It’s also a reference mass for determining whether someone is a witch.
Leave a Reply