Dropsafe

by Alec Muffett

California court has decided that privacy is dangerous and that disappearing messages facilitate drug sales

In other news: telephone calls are equally ephemeral, likely to be banned.

Cal Superior Court just rejected in Neville v. Snap Inc., a lawsuit involving users who overdosed on drugs allegedly purchased via Snap.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1742704433727951028.html
⊞

Comments

3 responses to “California court has decided that privacy is dangerous and that disappearing messages facilitate drug sales”

  1. happyborg

    @alecm It's ok, they're all recorded. ????

  2. gwire

    @alecm making phone calls non-ephemeral (from a state’s perspective) hasn’t required any changes at the user end

  3. BREAKING: US State of Nevada attempting to BAN End-to-End Encryption for Teenagers, Kids (and: implicitly MANDATE age-verification) due to ostensible dangers to children that somehow vanish on 18th birthday – Dropsafe

    […] OF COURSE, end-to-end encryption (along with, e.g., disappearing messages & other forms of attack-surface minimisation) are — for purposes of Law Enforcement and how […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts