*** REPORT-print-previous.md	2022-06-30 11:39:18.000000000 +0100
--- REPORT-print.md	2022-06-30 11:45:03.000000000 +0100
***************
*** 28,34 ****
  ### Version
  
  * This report was generated at:
!     * 2022/06/30 10:39:17 UTC.
  * Announcement blog post at:
      * URL TBC
  * Latest versions of this report are available at:
--- 28,34 ----
  ### Version
  
  * This report was generated at:
!     * 2022/06/30 10:45:03 UTC.
  * Announcement blog post at:
      * URL TBC
  * Latest versions of this report are available at:
***************
*** 2995,3010 ****
  Each app internally provides morphology and syntax structures to
  better transport these expressions for us.  Messaging apps are
  *expressive media*, and -- like the opposite of a
! *Pidgin* ^[*Pidgin*: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pidgin]
  -- each of these apps embiggens our native language(s) in different
  ways that make them more fit for online expression.  We benefit from
! more difference and diversity of approach in this embiggening -- in
! how apps are engineered to help us *express* ourselves better, so that
! there is evolution and improvement.
  
  We need more and different and diverse apps, not fewer and more
! standardised.  Demanding "open APIs" to whatever, to enable "open
! markets", will not deliver the improvements that we need.
  
  Regulators -- following their usual playbook -- believe that apps are
  fungible, technological, monopolistic transport media, deserving of
--- 2995,3013 ----
  Each app internally provides morphology and syntax structures to
  better transport these expressions for us.  Messaging apps are
  *expressive media*, and -- like the opposite of a
! *pidgin* ^[*pidgin*: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pidgin]
  -- each of these apps embiggens our native language(s) in different
  ways that make them more fit for online expression.  We benefit from
! having *more difference* and *more diversity* of approach in this
! embiggening -- in how apps are engineered to help us *express*
! ourselves better, so that there is evolution and improvement.
  
  We need more and different and diverse apps, not fewer and more
! standardised. Demanding "a single inbox" shuns this change.  The state
! calling for "interoperability" above all else -- in order to enable
! "open markets" of startup access to cattle-like users -- will not
! deliver, and indeed will even *hamper*, evolution of the improvements
! that we need.
  
  Regulators -- following their usual playbook -- believe that apps are
  fungible, technological, monopolistic transport media, deserving of