Blogging ‘set to peak next year’

Gartner. Gotta love ’em. I don’t expect unbounded growth, but they are looking at the wrong metrics.

They’re staring at the finger, not at what the finger points.

(Via)

BBC News

The blogging phenomenon is set to peak in 2007, according to technology predictions by analysts Gartner. The analysts said that during the middle of next year the number of blogs will level out at about 100 million.

The firm has said that 200 million people have already stopped writing their blogs.

Gartner has made 10 predictions, including stating that Vista will be the last major release of Windows and PCs will halve in cost by 2010.

Gartner analyst Daryl Plummer said the reason for the levelling off in blogging was due to the fact that most people who would ever start a web blog had already done so.

He said those who loved blogging were committed to keeping it up, while others had become bored and moved on.

“A lot of people have been in and out of this thing,” Mr Plummer said.

“Everyone thinks they have something to say, until they’re put on stage and asked to say it.”

Last month blog tracking firm Technorati reported that 100,000 new blogs were being created every day, and 1.3 million blog posts were written.

Technorati is tracking more than 57 million blogs, of which it believes around 55% are “active” and updated at least every three months.

Gartner also predicted that:

By 2010, the average total cost of ownership of new PCs will fall by 50%

By 2010, 60% of the worldwide cellular population will be “trackable” via an emerging “follow-me internet”

By the end of 2007, 75% of enterprises will be infected with undetected, financially motivated, targeted malware that evaded their traditional perimeter and host defences

Comments

2 responses to “Blogging ‘set to peak next year’”

  1. Stephen Usher
    re: Blogging ‘set to peak next year’

    Well, both Forrester and Gartner seem to generate lots of reports which are written by people who wet thier finger and stick it up in the air to feel the breeze.

    I really don’t know how they continue to be believed by anyone, I realy don’t. Then again, seeing as their main market for the reports is the stock markets and they work on rumour and hearsay most of the time rather than anything scientific, I shouldn’t be that surprised.

    By the way, does anyone want to buy this old rope? It’s only £150000, it’s exclusive and it’s really important for your stock portfolio.

  2. Ben
    re: Blogging ‘set to peak next year’

    And yet, that pink paper of stock-market punditry, the Financial Times, seems to be one of the most reliably accurate newspapers, ie. it’s an actual <i>news</i>paper, rather than a complete rag, like the Times or the Guardian.

    The reason? Powerful people make serious money transactions based (in part, at least) upon information therein. You know the kinds of people I mean… not the rich people you’ve heard of, but the kinds of rich you’ve never heard, and never will, because they have real money, based on smart investment, not on the false-frontage of the media industries.

    ttfn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *