If you’re looking for a list of things to be angry or worried about, regarding “Internet Security” vs State attempts to inveigle their way into owning it, @JoeBeOne has you covered…

Unrolled (click through above for links)

Out today: Internet Impact Briefs – A New Way To Assess How Policies May Affect The Internet (and How You Can Create One) @ndunleavy @carlgahnberg @internetsociety

In addition to a guide on how to conduct an Internet impact assessment ( https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2021/how-to-conduct-an-internet-impact-brief/ ), we are publishing five impact briefs today… I’ll describe them in thread:

The first covers the EU NIS 2 proposal, which would regulate key Internet infrastructure providers such as DNS services, TLD registries and certificate authorities that operate in the European market:

The second impact brief examines the 2021 Indian Intermediary Guidelines and the potential impacts of traceability in e2ee, take down mandates, and client-side scanning by @neetibiyani @AmritaChoudhury

The third brief looks at Canada’s proposed Online Harms Legislation and, among other things, its attempt to apply domestic Canadian law to the Internet, a global resource, by @mebuell and Joel Templeton @IsocManitoba

The fourth discusses the serious implications for trustworthiness of the Internet from mandated browser root certificates (QWACs) in the EU’s eIDAS regulation on the Internet by Marshall Erwin @carlgahnberg @udbhav_tiwari @futureidentity

Finally the fifth impact brief analyses the technical architecture of the GAIA-X digitally sovereign cloud project, finds that it is well-aligned with the Internet; potential effects will come down to implementation and deployment, by @kolkman @arobach22

Originally tweeted by Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall (@JoeBeOne) on 2021/11/08.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *