Unrolled:
Welcome to the Online Regulation Analogy Collection: speech as everything that it isn’t (and certainly not as the freedom that underpins all other freedoms).
Prompted by the ever-lengthening list of analogies invoked to justify why a discretionary regulator should take control of what we say online. #OnlineHarms #OnlineSafetyBill
Speech is not a protruding nail waiting to trip you up. #DutyOfCare
Speech is not a suitcase full of cash. #ID #KYC #BankingRegulation
Speech is not a speeding lump of metal. #InternetDrivingLicence
Speech is not a chemical. #PollutedOnlineEnvironment
Speech is not salmonella #FoodSafety
Speech is not an unguarded power saw. #HealthAndSafety #FactoriesActs
Hitting the send button doesn’t propel me through a glass windscreen. #SeatBelts
What's more….
It’s my tweet. #ProductLiability #DutyOfCare
A campsite owner has no duty to supervise a camper’s cooking. #FoodSafety #DutyOfCare (Thanks to the Australian eSafety Commissioner for the food safety analogy https://www.zdnet.com/article/australias-esafety-and-the-uphill-battle-of-regulating-the-ever-changing-online-realm/)
A café owner has no duty to prevent customers misinforming each other. #OccupiersLiability #DutyOfCare
Online users are not guests on daytime TV. #BroadcastRegulation
Lastly, there is no tech magic wand: online or offline. #Fantasy
Originally tweeted by Graham Smith (@cyberleagle) on 2021/05/03.
Leave a Reply