Dropsafe

by Alec Muffett

“OpenAI, defender of user privacy” – not what you would typically expect to hear from civil society, but in this case it’s true…

All of those worthy “ZOMG Creator Copyright vs: AI” arguments are putting user privacy and agency at risk, and potentially set a bad precedent for the privacy of end-to-end encryption too, because the New York Times wants “discoverability” of all output:

Earlier this month, Judge Wang entered a preliminary order requiring OpenAl to preserve and segregate all output logs, prioritizing the duty to preserve responsive data over competing privacy and user contract requirements. OpenAl repeatedly urged the Court to reconsider that order – most recently, filing a 21-page brief last week that called the preservation order “unprecedented” and argued it forces the Al giant to violate user privacy commitments.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeff-kelly_artificialintelligence-ai-ediscovery-activity-7333119434837942272-ILjZ?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAAvmJsB4l3t9PdFOdObHwlNHfKDpPBagBc

⊞
Fediverse reactions

Comments

2 responses to ““OpenAI, defender of user privacy” – not what you would typically expect to hear from civil society, but in this case it’s true…”

  1. Blender Dumbass ( J.Y.Amihud )

    @alecm This is why people should use software and not services.

    1. alecm

      I can’t say that it would improve matters much, we are already seeing early attempts to oblige software providers to put spyware into apps on behalf of the government

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts