If Meta or Google deplatformed someone over a Mastodon post (without their committing some overt criminal act) Civil Society would utterly lose its shit; therefore…

…therefore that’s why some of us in Trust & Safety are so eager to learn why infosec expert Florian Roth was suddenly booted from Mastodon’s infosec.exchange — because it might be the first big instance of Fediverse political bias leaking into community moderation.


Roth, a German (?) and without an apparent political axe to grind, has been arguing (and supporting other, noted, infosec theorists – Troy Hunt, FFS) in posts on Twitter/X that however much we might disdain what Musk is doing with his DOGE project, it might be arguably legitimate, or at very least not as “bad” as you are describing:

https://twitter.com/cyb3rops/status/1888515360636166149

…and then suddenly *poof* his Mastodon account on the infosec.exchange community has apparently been pulled-out from beneath him, like a rug.

There is, simply, not enough popcorn available for the next few hours: the fediverse was meant to be the great saviour from the unaccountable whims of power as wielded by Very Large Online Platforms. The potential for free-speech irony is tremendous.

An appeal has been filed. We wait, with bated breath.

https://twitter.com/cyb3rops/status/1888635690318979483

Updates

https://twitter.com/cyb3rops/status/1888706811819352260?s=46

[…] I only used that account to follow a few friends who left Twitter over a year ago, mainly Kevin, because I liked his attitude, memes, and valuable content. It seems they banned me for defending Elon Musk a few times. I do like him as an entrepreneur and agree with many of his views, but I always tried to stay rational and neutral. Getting blocked on Mastodon for defending Elon’s raised arm and recommending the Rogan/Zuckerberg interview on X is honestly hilarious. […]

Update 2

It’s been walked back. Still unclear why.

Fediverse reactions

Comments

3 responses to “If Meta or Google deplatformed someone over a Mastodon post (without their committing some overt criminal act) Civil Society would utterly lose its shit; therefore…”

  1. “invite him” – that’s the canonical response, isn’t it? But that misses the point: the Fediverse aims to escape unaccountable power over content—yet, to me, and I would argue in demonstrable fact, that it actually amplifies reach, diversity, and arbitrariness of whimsical authority, making the overall environment far more fragile.

  2. pixelpusher220

    How exactly is someone de-platformed from a protocol? Is this person somehow guaranteed to be granted an account on their choice of server? Pick a different one.

    We allow local moderation and membership decisions while allowing anyone to create their own personal server they can never be booted from.

    Try that with Meta, Bluesky or any other silo. We’ll wait.

    1. Simply: each instance is a platform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *