Typiquement français, via Google Translate:
In a ruling handed down on Thursday, the Court of Appeal considered that “the best interests of the child” are a “primary consideration” that justifies infringing on “other rights such as freedom of expression.” “Prioritizing the protection of the privacy of adult consumers” is “incompatible with the right of minors to be protected from access” to “content that is inappropriate for their age, likely to jeopardize their intimate development, contribute to addictive phenomena and promote the dissemination of an inaccurate and degraded image of sexuality,” the court wrote.
Leave a Reply