Digital Waco, Digital Jonestown?

For years the infosec community has languished under regular excitable and excited claims that we imminently face “Digital Pearl Harbor” — a surprise cyber-offensive that will decapitate either of:

  1. a somehow-national internet, like a specifically British internet or specifically American internet — neither of which exist; or:
  2. some Critical National Infrastructure attached to the same, e.g.: Air Traffic Control, even though such CNI seems entirely capable of taking itself down — and if “we” as a nation are not conducting Disaster Recovery scenarios upon those grounds then we deserve whatever happens to us

What’s far more likely in this era of burgeoning fragmentation and federation is that one or more online communities will ideologically isolate themselves — e.g. for a failure of the world to submit to the orthodoxy of their preferred content moderation — and then metaphorically explode or implode, either (the former) through involvement of law enforcement, or (the latter) though cultural toxicity.

Nobody wants to talk about this issue in such terms, not least because it provides little opportunity for selling products to the government. Woe to a doomed metaphor.

But of course it could also be that this has already happened, repeatedly, to varying extents, in many places, and… just that nobody really noticed or cared.

Same as Digital Pearl Harbor, really.

Comments

4 responses to “Digital Waco, Digital Jonestown?”

  1. Chris

    On the flipside, there are online communities which thrive because their content moderation is performed in such a way that those who behave in bad faith or who refuse to abide by a reasonable behavioral code (as distinct from a RightThink-enforcing hyper-orthodoxy) are shown the door. I can live with that!

    1. It’s funny what happens when you invent laws and a police force.

  2. @alecm as an American it’s hard for me to look at this only through the lens of content moderation — ideological isolation is ever-present in our politics & culture, and various groups choose the tools/tech available to them at any given time. A lot of people may be willing to acknowledge the potential you describe, yet it feels less productive to focus on content moderation as something external or different from the overall oppressive & often violent motivations underpinning everything these groups do to either control their own members and/or grow their power through converting others.

    1. I’m seeing it as much more than a matter of content moderation: it’s a proliferation of unbounded numbers of closed environments with the freedom to create their own rules and regulations to abide by. If anything this smacks to me more of the vogue for communes and independent communities, sometimes on desert islands or in deep outback jungle – and hence my metaphor.

      To call it a matter of content moderation is to presuppose that such communities will be democratic and liberal. “Moderate” is a big word with a whole pile of baggage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *