ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY | Opinion 5/2009 on online social networking

Revisiting this mid-2009 PDF from the EU regarding “SNS” or “Social Networking Services”, is a delight of then-vs-now-isms, e.g.:

“if you have too many Facebook Friends you may have to register as a data controller”

Quote:

Typically, access to data (profile data, postings, stories…) contributed by a user is limited to self-selected contacts. In some cases however, users may acquire a high number of third party contacts, some of whom he may not actually know. A high number of contacts could be an indication that the household exception does not apply and therefore that the user would be considered a data controller.

https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2009/wp163_en.pdf

Not to mention the lovingly naive and “not our fault at all” pre-Cambridge-Analytica perspective regarding data access by third parties:

SNS [SOCIAL NETWORK SERVICES] should have the means to ensure that third party applications comply with the Data Protection and ePrivacy Directives. This implies, in particular, that they provide clear and specific information to users about the processing of their personal data and that they only have access to necessary personal data. Therefore, layered access should be offered to third party developers by the SNS so they can opt for a mode of access that is intrinsically more limited. SNS should ensure furthermore that users may easily report concerns about applications.

Comments

One response to “ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY | Opinion 5/2009 on online social networking”

  1. […] But I digress… the nature of civil society discourse over the past 10 years has taught Facebook/Meta that they are not allowed to win the popular narrative, so instead they should just attempt to surf on top of it. They are disconnected from their users – and this is not healthy, but we have essentially done it to ourselves; Cambridge Analytica itself was a consequence of 2009-era fears of “platforms locking up all [our] data”. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *